Prepectoral vs Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction: An Evidence-Based Comparison
Above or below the muscle? A sourced, even-handed comparison of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.
Read article →Above or below the muscle? A sourced, even-handed comparison of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.
Read article →A plain-language patient guide to rigottomia: what happens, whether it is safe, scarring, anaesthetic, recovery and how many sessions to expect.
Read article →How rigottomia releases the fibrous restriction behind tuberous breasts, areola herniation, scars and burns — then reshapes and volumises with fat.
Read article →The questions worth asking to make an informed, confident decision about your reconstruction.
Read article →A structured, six-dimension framework for comparing biological matrices on the properties that actually matter — rather than on branding.
Read article →What prepectoral breast reconstruction is, why it spares the chest muscle, and how a biological matrix and fat grafting enable the technique.
Read article →A surgeon-facing overview of how rigottomia reconditions the recipient bed — release, expansion and vascular access — to improve fat graft take.
Read article →From early rest and drain care to months of settling — a general overview of what recovery tends to involve.
Read article →The main complication categories in implant-based reconstruction and how matrix properties and fat grafting act as controllable levers on risk and contour.
Read article →How medical technology — from biological matrices to fat dialysis — is reshaping implant-based breast reconstruction toward muscle-sparing, biology-led results.
Read article →From the ExaShape® biological matrix for breast reconstruction to the EXAFAT® fat-grafting system — explore the full range of ABC devices.
Explore our productsSend us a message and our team will get back to you within 1–2 business days.