ExaShape in Practice: Which Configuration, Which Patient, and How to Use It
Why ExaShape, in which cases, which configuration, and how it is used in theatre, from the flap decision to the refinement stage.
Read article →Why ExaShape, in which cases, which configuration, and how it is used in theatre, from the flap decision to the refinement stage.
Read article →The randomised head-to-heads favour synthetic mesh on seroma; biological matrices offer integration into thin cover. The choice is made patient by patient.
Read article →Pooled data favour prepectoral placement on three outcomes and disfavour it on none. The evidence is consistent but observational, and the first…
Read article →A meta-analysis, a randomised trial and a prospective cohort give three different answers. Selection on the mastectomy flap explains all three.
Read article →Prepectoral placement moves the burden from the muscle to the mastectomy flap. An improvement where the flap can carry it, a mistake…
Read article →Implant for structure, fat for the living envelope, matrix for support: the rationale, technique and published outcomes of hybrid reconstruction.
Read article →What PMRT does to implant-based reconstruction, the timing debate, the prepectoral question and the role of matrix support and fat grafting.
Read article →A professional overview of DTI reconstruction: the selection criteria, the cautions, and where soft-tissue matrix support fits.
Read article →Above or below the muscle? A sourced, even-handed comparison of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.
Read article →From the ExaShape® biological matrix for breast reconstruction to the EXAFAT® fat-grafting system — explore the full range of ABC devices.
Explore our productsSend us a message and our team will get back to you within 1–2 business days.