The Clinical Evidence for Biological Matrices in Breast Reconstruction
Which outcomes matter, the limits of the current literature, and a framework for critically appraising biological matrix evidence in implant-based reconstruction.
Read article →Which outcomes matter, the limits of the current literature, and a framework for critically appraising biological matrix evidence in implant-based reconstruction.
Read article →What a biological matrix is, how it works inside the body, and why it has become a defining tool of modern implant-based…
Read article →Two technologies, one plan: a supporting, integrating matrix plus cleaner grafting fat for muscle-sparing prepectoral reconstruction.
Read article →A plain-language overview of breast reconstruction options after mastectomy — implant-based vs. autologous, timing, placement, and the technology involved.
Read article →The fat dialysis idea behind ExaFat: clean the lipoaspirate, preserve its regenerative fraction, and make grafting more predictable.
Read article →How fat grafting adds natural soft tissue to a reconstruction, and why the way fat is processed — and the SVF preserved…
Read article →A bilayer, bovine pericardium-derived matrix engineered to support an implant and actively encourage integration and new blood-vessel formation.
Read article →Plain-language answers to the questions patients ask most about biological matrix safety — rejection, risks, animal-derived material and longevity.
Read article →The discipline that plans cancer removal and aesthetic reconstruction as a single objective — and where med tech fits in.
Read article →How biological matrix, ADM and synthetic mesh differ once inside the body, and the factors surgeons actually weigh when choosing implant support.
Read article →From the ExaShape® biological matrix for breast reconstruction to the EXAFAT® fat-grafting system — explore the full range of ABC devices.
Explore our productsSend us a message and our team will get back to you within 1–2 business days.