Interactive Tool · Advanced Biomedical Concept

Breast Reconstruction Options Explorer

Compare the main approaches to breast reconstruction side by side — how each works, what supports the reconstruction, and where biological matrix and fat grafting fit. Select a pathway to explore, or switch to the comparison table.

Implant-based — Prepectoral

Above the muscle

The breast implant is placed above the pectoralis major muscle, in the subcutaneous plane, supported by a biological matrix rather than the muscle.

Muscle handling
Muscle spared (left intact)
Soft-tissue support
Biological matrix / ADM
Key considerations
Avoids animation deformity; generally less muscle-related postoperative pain. Depends on adequate mastectomy-flap quality.

What it involves: A biological matrix (bovine pericardium or ADM) provides coverage and pocket support; often single-stage direct-to-implant. Fat grafting is frequently used to refine coverage.

Where ABC fits: ExaShape & PREPEC matrices + EXAFAT fat grafting

Implant-based — Subpectoral / Dual-plane

Below the muscle

The implant is placed partly or fully beneath the pectoralis major muscle, which is elevated to provide part of the coverage.

Muscle handling
Muscle elevated & divided
Soft-tissue support
Muscle + optional matrix
Key considerations
A long-established approach; can be more forgiving of thin flaps, but carries the possibility of animation deformity and muscle-related discomfort.

What it involves: The muscle is lifted and divided to form the pocket; may be combined with a matrix for lower-pole support. Often staged with a tissue expander.

Where ABC fits: Matrix support (ExaShape) where lower-pole reinforcement is used

Autologous — Flap Reconstruction

Own tissue, no implant

The breast is rebuilt using the patient's own tissue (skin, fat, sometimes muscle) transferred from another part of the body — for example the abdomen or back.

Muscle handling
Depends on flap type
Soft-tissue support
Patient's own tissue
Key considerations
Produces an entirely autologous result but involves a donor site and longer recovery. Not implant- or matrix-based.

What it involves: A longer, more complex microsurgical or pedicled operation with a donor site; no breast implant is required.

Where ABC fits: Not implant/matrix-based — outside the ABC device platform

Hybrid — Implant + Fat Grafting

Implant plus autologous refinement

An implant-based reconstruction (often prepectoral) is combined with autologous fat grafting to add a layer of the patient's own tissue over the device.

Muscle handling
Usually muscle-sparing
Soft-tissue support
Biological matrix + autologous fat
Key considerations
Combines the structure of an implant with the soft-tissue quality of fat grafting. Graft durability depends on how the fat is processed.

What it involves: A biological matrix supports the implant, and fat grafting softens contours, improves coverage, and reduces visible rippling — especially in thin-flap patients.

Where ABC fits: ExaShape matrix + EXAFAT fat grafting (fat dialysis)

Fat Grafting (adjunct / selected cases)

Lipofilling

Autologous fat grafting (lipofilling) transfers the patient's own processed fat to correct contour, rippling, or defects — used mainly as an adjunct, and as a primary approach only in selected cases.

Muscle handling
Not applicable
Soft-tissue support
Autologous fat only
Key considerations
Frequently staged across sessions. Closed-system processing such as fat dialysis aims to preserve the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) that supports graft take.

What it involves: Fat is harvested by liposuction, processed, and reinjected. Volume retention depends heavily on the processing method used before reinjection.

Where ABC fits: EXAFAT closed-system fat grafting (fat dialysis)
ApproachHow it worksMuscleSoft-tissue supportWhere ABC fits
Implant-based — Prepectoral The breast implant is placed above the pectoralis major muscle, in the subcutaneous plane, supported by a biological matrix rather than the muscle. Muscle spared (left intact) Biological matrix / ADM ExaShape & PREPEC matrices + EXAFAT fat grafting
Implant-based — Subpectoral / Dual-plane The implant is placed partly or fully beneath the pectoralis major muscle, which is elevated to provide part of the coverage. Muscle elevated & divided Muscle + optional matrix Matrix support (ExaShape) where lower-pole reinforcement is used
Autologous — Flap Reconstruction The breast is rebuilt using the patient's own tissue (skin, fat, sometimes muscle) transferred from another part of the body — for example the abdomen or back. Depends on flap type Patient's own tissue Not implant/matrix-based — outside the ABC device platform
Hybrid — Implant + Fat Grafting An implant-based reconstruction (often prepectoral) is combined with autologous fat grafting to add a layer of the patient's own tissue over the device. Usually muscle-sparing Biological matrix + autologous fat ExaShape matrix + EXAFAT fat grafting (fat dialysis)
Fat Grafting (adjunct / selected cases) Autologous fat grafting (lipofilling) transfers the patient's own processed fat to correct contour, rippling, or defects — used mainly as an adjunct, and as a primary approach only in selected cases. Not applicable Autologous fat only EXAFAT closed-system fat grafting (fat dialysis)
This explorer is for general education only. It describes reconstruction approaches in broad terms and does not recommend any option for any individual. The suitability of a technique depends on each patient's clinical situation and is decided by the operating surgeon. Device indications and contraindications are defined by the applicable CE-marked instructions for use.